The Daily Mail is one of a number of papers which puts the latest phase of the shake-up - new rules allowing over-55s to dip into their pension pots - on its front page.
"George Osborne's move raises the prospect of pensioners using theirfunds almost like bank accounts to invest in property or shares, pay off debts or help children and grandchildren," the paper says.
The Daily Telegraph quotes the chancellor as explaining: "People who have worked and saved all their lives will be able to access as much or as little of their defined contribution pension as they want from next year and pass on their hard-earned pensions to their families tax free."
However the government's "old people tsar" Ros Altmann admits to the paper that "most pension companies do not make it easy for pensioners to withdraw their pensions".
She urges them to adapt to the new flexibility that the changes offer their customers.
Not everyone in the pension industry has welcomed the change, outlined in a draft bill.
One financial consultant tells the Times he is "alarmed at the idea that a fund would apparently be obliged to pay out as much as an individual required.
"Managing a pension pot in retirement is a task that even a pension professional finds challenging but, for someone who has never engaged before with pensions, it is extraordinarily difficult," Tom McPhail, of Hargreaves Lansdown says.
"I disagree with Nigel" is how the Daily Mirror headlines a story saying that national broadcasters are to invite Nigel Farage to join a series of pre-general election televised debates alongside the leaders of the "big three" parties.
The Mirror says David Cameron thinks UKIP's invite is "unfair" on the Green party, although Labour leader Ed Miliband said the PM should welcome the debate and not put up "false obstacles".
Green party leader Natalie Bennett asks why her party has not been invited to the debate despite having had an MP in the Commons for four years
The Guardian says the invitation has led to "a deluge of criticism and threats of legal action" with the Liberal Democrats, George Galloway and the nationalist parties, joining Mr Cameron and the Greens in their disquiet.
Green party leader Natalie Bennett tells the paper: "We are deadly serious about taking legal action over this, and seeing how we can raise the funds.
"The public want a serious debate in which they hear the full range of views, including a party that stands up against UKIP on immigration."
The Daily Express's editorial welcomes the expanded debates plan, but says: "For the established parties sharing a stage with the UKIP leader is a huge risk. As the maverick opponent of the established political classMr Farage undoubtedly has an advantage."
The Independent agrees. Calling the debates "democracy in action" it cautions the other three participants "not to agree too much with Nigel".
But the paper adds, "barring something extraordinary, past experience, limited though it may be, suggests the debates will not be the election's deciding factor."
No comments:
Post a Comment